Bardo wrote:
I have considered attending a SMART recovery meeting. I researched it some one weekend. I was rather turned off that they don't allow labels such as an 'alcoholic'. Therein I don't want to sit around listening to someone try to control their drinking, counting drinks or beer and wine only... I mean I did that kind of stuff for years denying my condition. In my mind alcoholism is a very black and white issue. You either are or you're not. You go to AA or thankfully now you utilize TSM. It's a very real, scientifically backed condition. Maybe I'll still try it in the effort to keep an open mind.
Hey Bardo
I have read your thread with interest. I am in a similar boat as you, though I had not the same degree of problems with alcohol, I am dependent nonetheless. I am also mostly abstinent for the better part of two years and have only recently dabbled....
I'm curious about your comment in the quote about the label "alcoholic"....
I mean, I guess I know what you're saying, (if I understand it) that people counting drinks and leaving liquor alone while denying they have any problem doesn't make sense.
Do you still consider yourself what society has deemed "alcoholic"?
Although I'm not sure there's a better term that is widely used, I still don't like it. People assume that as an alcoholic, I get stupid drunk, fall down, piss myself, drive recklessly and a million other things that I really didn't do. There are horrible alcoholics out there that are just a complete other level from where I was at, and I drank quite a bit. But without the drama I guess.
(BTW, in no way do I mean "horrible" as in a bad person. I mean a horrible problem which it can certain be....)
I never did go to AA. My father wanted me to badly, he even had a friend buy me the Big Book, and while I found the first part of it interesting, I really didn't see myself entirely in those stories, and I hadn't really hurt anyone with my drinking - other than myself of course.
I do not like the word "never", as in my father telling his 44 year old son "you can never drink again, it's poison now, you could die if you ever drink again"
I have just been white knuckling it on my own, doing pretty well, but rarely feeling like myself, always the craving underneath though it is often manageable since I'm either busy at work or exhausted. I miss the social aspect of a few beers though, and having previously lived life without brakes and lots of options, feel really limited in the world where "I can't drink". Many say that they've come to not feel weird - and I say, good for them. Whether divine intervention, providence, or good old science of TSM provided relief, it doesn't matter. But as you know, no amount of others telling you how your broken brain should feel does a dang bit of good!!
I also, had done my research on the other side of AA and found that there is a whole school of thought out there that says, your usual AA member can be "frozen" in time with their addiction, and is never really able to return to firing on all cylinders. Too much focus like you've said on "disease" and so forth..... the arrested alcoholic becomes arrested as a person, stunted, and refuses to get over it and grow as a human being. Though perhaps the support would have helped me to mitigate my anxiety of going it alone, I was afraid to have AA get it's hooks in me, and me becoming "addicted" to it in some way.
Anyway, I'm just curious about your comment, not in a negative way at all. I just related that to my own experience and dislike the term because as TSM book says, we have to live with this stereotype of being an alcoholic and I do not want to be pigeonholed. I want to believe that maybe I can still have a life with some choice and control, and though I am mostly accepting that I'll not be able to drink without some help from NAL I would very much like to be free of the everpresent static of cravings for C2H60.
thanks all....
Zk