Quote:
One of the main advantages of the Sinclair Method is that you do not need to have a serious drinking problem or be an alcoholic to take advantage of extinction treatment. If you tend to drink too much on certain occasions and simply want to reduce your intake, begin taking naltrexone before drinking.* The research proves that you will find yourself more in control, and you will begin to drink less. You can still drink, moderately and safely—if you choose to do so.
Let's discuss this because I think it is important. Two scenarios:
1. On a fairly regular basis you have social obligations with your work. On these occasions you tend to drink too much and it is (or could) having a negative effect on your career. Being work related, these social functions aren't really all that much fun to begin with.
2. You love to go out with friends and you always have a blast when you do. Painting the town red is the best. It's always great fun. The not fun only happens the next day with the hang-overs, call-outs, lost productivity, and the ever present "I said/did what?!"
In the first scenario taking Nal will be a great help. You won't drink as much, and (being work) they weren't all that much fun anyway, so you are very likely to not stop taking the pill.
In the 2nd scenario the book makes it sound like you can have your cake and eat it too. But you can't. You want to have just as much fun, but stop before the fun ends and the other stuff begins. The problem is, after you've taken the pill the "fun" is nowhere near as fun as it is without the pill. Dilemma: Do I give up the fun, or do I give up the hangovers/aftermath? I think most choose not to give up the fun and stop taking their Nal. Nal is not what allows you to stop drinking. Nal takes away the
fun of drinking, which allows
you to stop drinking.
As the book says, most alcoholics no longer enjoy drinking. It is easy to give up the fun when you reach this state. When alcohol has become a horror. But if you've yet to see the horror of where alcohol leads, you are going to need a great deal of discipline not to start skipping dosages.
I think TSM works for light
and hardcore drinkers equally. I just think hard core drinkers are more likely to faithfully follow the Golden Rule.
And if you don't follow The Golden Rule, it isn't TSM.
If someone here decides they miss the fun and begins to skip dosages (and then shows no improvement), does that mean TSM doesn't work? Does it mean it doesn't work for them?
Or does it mean nothing, because the protocol wasn't followed?
And I'll leave off with this: Did you ever know an alcoholic who was completely honest about their drinking, which by extension would mean their adherence to The Golden Rule?