*
It is currently Sat Oct 11, 2025 8:32 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Netty's Weekly Progress
PostPosted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:27 pm
Posts: 729
Location: New York State
Thanks, Nettie. I was not aware that the Sinclair test subjects met criterion such as those you mention. I have noted that your pre-Sinclair drinking levels were significantly lower than many of us here on the forum. Was this the case with the Sinclair research subjects? If so, then we heavier drinkers are all really the first 'real world' subjects of this method. We owe it not only to ourselves, but to alcoholics all over the world, to 'hang in there' for as long as it takes.

My gut tells me. . .this IS going to work. But today, my heart feels discouraged.

So I remind myself of something my precious aunt used to say when I was going thru hard times as a youngster: "This, too, shall pass."


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Netty's Weekly Progress
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:44 am
Posts: 71
Goin4More wrote:
Thanks, Nettie. I was not aware that the Sinclair test subjects met criterion such as those you mention. I have noted that your pre-Sinclair drinking levels were significantly lower than many of us here on the forum. Was this the case with the Sinclair research subjects?

I can't give you a firm answer regarding the pre-Sinclair drinking levels of published study participants subsequent to 1997, but if you look at the (not previously published) graph on Page 29 in the book, the "y" axis (drinks per week) for 115 successful patients peaks at an average of about 37 drinks per week, flattening out around 9 after approx. 250 days. Similar data from the first 40 patients was published in 1997.

If so, then we heavier drinkers are all really the first 'real world' subjects of this method. We owe it not only to ourselves, but to alcoholics all over the world, to 'hang in there' for as long as it takes.

Absolutely!

My gut tells me. . .this IS going to work. But today, my heart feels discouraged.

I hope you're feeling more hopeful today!

So I remind myself of something my precious aunt used to say when I was going thru hard times as a youngster: "This, too, shall pass."
I've heard that saying more times than I care to remember...

_________________
Pre-TSM: 42 units (US)
Wk1-4: 29, 24, 22, 21
Wk5-8: 18, 19, 15, 17
Wk9-12: 15, 18, 13, 14
Wk13-16: 16, 14, 13, 15
Wk17-20: 14, 15, 14, 14
Wk21-24: 13, 14, 13, 14
Wk25-28: 11,


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Netty's Weekly Progress
PostPosted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:10 pm
Posts: 316
Location: Chicago, IL
Great post, Netty - you really should post it in General Discussion so all can see, including G4Ms question about levels...a lot of important points.

Also - I wonder if it's only wise to cut to 25mg if you have a set drinking time...like if you drink nightly for a few hours at a time (which is my MO) since the decrease represents a decrease in the time you are 'covered'. There may be some drinkers here who have sporadic drinks throughout the day so I would think they should stick to 50mg.

Congrats on the continued progress - great to see :D

ps. I also probably fit the profile rat more closely: lower initial pre-sinc amounts, no major anxiety /depresssion...also a daily drinker so I get extinguished every night :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Netty's Weekly Progress
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:44 am
Posts: 71
Week 12 complete. I’m well on the way to being “cured” – at least based on the definition I determined would be my standard for TSM success at the start of treatment 12 weeks ago (my goal was/is moderation, not abstinence). I’m consistently drinking at a moderate level (not more than 14 US units/week, no more than 4 units in 1 day, and at least 1 AF day) with virtually no craving -- but of course, always taking (25mg) Nal before doing so. Starting this week, I’ll post brief weekly stats including: High unit consumption amount/day, #AF days, total units/week, % reduction from pre-NAL. Since I'm only drinking during a 1-2 hour period (dinner time) now, I'm also planning to drop my dosage to 12.5mg to see if I perceive any difference in craving level. Based on the research I’ve done, 12.5 should be sufficient to block alcohol-induced endorphins for 2 – 3 hours, so I‘m going to give that a try primarily “in the name of science”, and secondarily, “in the name of my pocketbook”. If I do notice an increase in craving, I’ll switch back to 25mg immediately.

High Day: 4 units
AF Days: 1
Total Weekly Units:14
% Redux pre-NAL: 67%

_________________
Pre-TSM: 42 units (US)
Wk1-4: 29, 24, 22, 21
Wk5-8: 18, 19, 15, 17
Wk9-12: 15, 18, 13, 14
Wk13-16: 16, 14, 13, 15
Wk17-20: 14, 15, 14, 14
Wk21-24: 13, 14, 13, 14
Wk25-28: 11,


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Netty's Weekly Progress
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 8:09 am
Posts: 437
Netty, what you are planning to do with your sucess as it is currently is very brave. I also think it is a great thing to post for the rest of this and will give Dr. Roy another example of using the Naltrexone this way. Good luck to you.

_________________
Pre Sinclair 60-100 units
Month 1 Av. 62 units
Month 2 Av. 68 Units
Month 3 Av. 58 Units
Month 4 Av 47.5 Units
Month 5 Av 48.5 Units
Month 6 Av. 30.7
Month 7 Av. 32.2
Month 8 Av. 39.7
Wk34 50Units
Wk 35 40U 1AF
Wk 36 4U 6AF


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Netty's Weekly Progress
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:00 am
Posts: 579
Location: England, UK
netty wrote:
For any lurkers or newcomers out there reading this post, please keep in mind that my progress may seem more “textbook” that a lot of folks on this board. I think that has to do with the fact that my drinking history, mental and physical health profile is a close match for those subjects who participated in TSM research studies. In order to test the safety and effectiveness an investigational drug has on a specific condition (such as alcoholism), it’s necessary (to the maximum extent possible) to exclude research subjects that have confounding variables, such as simultaneous/contraindicated drug use, serious psychiatric illness (i.e., severe depression and anxiety), and physical ailments that preclude including the subject for medical trials. I’m providing this information because I know many folks frequenting this board and currently following TSM are struggling with slow progress because they don’t meet the “research subject criteria“ -- and may feel that other folks moving along at a faster clip is cause for doubting the efficacy of TSM extinction protocol -- thus, giving up on the program too soon.


Hi netty,

Excellent post.

I'm particularly interested in the paragraph above. You're obviously knowledgeable about protocols followed in clinical trials. I don't recall the topic of "research subject criteria" being mentioned in Dr Eskapa's book but perhaps it's time I read the book again.

Your comments have shed new light on TSM and why, perhaps, I have not seen any progress to date.

Thanks a lot.

V.

_________________
Weekly Consumption
Wk01-10: 86, 98, 103, 104, 97, 92, 102, 103, 102, 107
Wk11-20: 100, 99, 100, 105, 108, 108, 89, 95, 105, 97
Wk21-30: 97, N/R, N/R, 97, 105, N/R, N/R, 107, 97, 98
Wk31-40: 93, 88, 87, 87, 91, 92, 94, N/R
UK units
N/R = Not Recorded


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Netty's Weekly Progress
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 4:27 pm
Posts: 729
Location: New York State
Your input on this is invaluable. I am only now beginning to approach the profile of subjects who participated in TSM studies. Pre-Sinclair, I regularly drank twice the amount of those people - no wonder I cannot compare my progress to theirs.

Taking this information as a baseline, then, I'm going to assume that I'm just entering into the phase that most subjects were at at the beginning of their treatment, and that my progress from here on out will more closely resemble theirs as they initiated treatment. My consumption now is down from an average of 75 upw, to an avg. of 50 upw. That's a 1/3 reduction - I'll take it.

Onward, and downward!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Netty's Weekly Progress
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:17 pm
Posts: 1793
I also fit into the group used in the studies -- no other drugs or psychiatric issues and lower Pre-Sinclair levels -- 40 to 50 units. Also, I am a runner and even when I'm hungover will run four miles a day (no better hangover remedy than sweating out the booze). These factors may have contributed to my almost immediate success with TSM.

_________________
Pre-TSM:50+wk/hangovers/blackouts/bad behavior
Regained Control wk36
Now:<20/wk/NO hangovers/blackouts/bad behavior
(Nothing in this post should be construed as medical/legal advice. Always consult a physician before taking prescription drugs.)


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Netty's Weekly Progress
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 7:40 pm
Posts: 962
Location: Florida
minneapolisnick wrote:
I also fit into the group used in the studies -- no other drugs or psychiatric issues and lower Pre-Sinclair levels -- 40 to 50 units. Also, I am a runner and even when I'm hungover will run four miles a day (no better hangover remedy than sweating out the booze). These factors may have contributed to my almost immediate success with TSM.
That's funny to me! I have always found that the best cure for a hangover was a greasy, high protein breakfast... something I don't really like. McDonald's Sausage McGriddles work extremely well. BTW, I am a 150 pound sedentary underweight male; go figure.

Bob

_________________
Code:
Pre-TSM~54u/Wk
Wk1-52:40,42,39,28,33,33,43,40,36,30,34,30,30║30,38,13,25,4,22,12,6,9,5,9,3,5║6,6,5,4,9,6,0,9,2,2,5,4,4║3,4,5,3,4,2,6,2,6,4,8,2,2u
W53-91: 4, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 1, 5, 4,17, 0, 0, 0║ 3, 0, 3, 0,3, 0, 2,0,0,0,0,0,0║0,0,0,2,0,2,0,0,3,0,0,2,0u
"Cured" @ Week 21 (5 Months),         Current Week: 97  (23rd Month)


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Netty's Weekly Progress
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 11:00 am
Posts: 579
Location: England, UK
minneapolisnick wrote:
I also fit into the group used in the studies -- no other drugs or psychiatric issues and lower Pre-Sinclair levels -- 40 to 50 units.


Hi Nick,

Would you be kind enough to point me to the page(s) in The Cure for Alcoholism where this group is mentioned?

Many thanks.

V.

_________________
Weekly Consumption
Wk01-10: 86, 98, 103, 104, 97, 92, 102, 103, 102, 107
Wk11-20: 100, 99, 100, 105, 108, 108, 89, 95, 105, 97
Wk21-30: 97, N/R, N/R, 97, 105, N/R, N/R, 107, 97, 98
Wk31-40: 93, 88, 87, 87, 91, 92, 94, N/R
UK units
N/R = Not Recorded


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group