It wasn't bad, but it could have been better.
I didn't get out as much information as I wanted because I had to spend a surprising amount of time clearing up some basic misconceptions. Aside from the usual AA-based "you must abstain" stuff, the host was under the impression that there was some sort of central TSM base where I had to apply to become a patient. This persisted a long time, with questions about how I "contacted them" and how long it took for me to "be accepted" for TSM and such. It took longer than I would have thought to get through that.
Today, in the best tradition of esprit d'escalier, I realized that I should have made an analogy to the Atkins diet -- yeah, it's named after somebody, but that doesn't mean you have to go be the client of somebody working for Atkins. Most people have heard of the Atkins diet, so that probably would have worked better than trying to explain it the long way around.
It was good to realize that that misconception exists. What with one thing and another, I can see how somebody would get that idea. I'll probably work up a blog post on that.
EDIT:
Whoops, I forgot to include the link to the podcast.
http://www.hulkshare.com/appetitefordiscussion/bottoms-up-afd-07-09-2014