sideeffect2 wrote:
50% at 3 years. So if you consider yourself part of the 70% cured at a year (at a year or under a year?) Then over the next 2 years, there is a (70-50)/70 (29%) chance of relapse. Damn. Almost 1 in 3.
Well, it's still a minority. And the real good news is that it's completely under our control.
sideeffect2 wrote:
Unless the nal has increased my self-knowledge and knowledge of the buzz to where I could be a normal drinker.
Yeeeeeah, I'm not sure there's a rewind button on this. We're doing an amateur rewiring of our brains. We haven't learned self-discipline or practiced resisting temptation or established internal limits. We just broke the addiction at a low level. We're more vulnerable to addiction than people who were never addicted, both because it's easier to relearn a once-learned behavior and because we're still the people who were susceptible in the first place.
If anyone asked my advice, I'd suggest that anyone who can learn/practice/establish should do so. Contrary to propaganda, it's not only possible but is actually the most common outcome of addiction.
I'm leery of suggesting moderation to anyone desperate enough to try TSM in the first place . . . but I'm not sure everyone who tries it is in fact desperate. It's a highly individual thing.
sideeffect2 wrote:
Im not even really sure I would actually enjoy alcohol again. When I accidentally had alcohol, I felt the buzz, but it was weird, kind of creepy feeling.
That's interesting. I wonder why that would be.
You mentioned earlier that, once you realized that the opioid buzz was the hook, you felt like you'd been tricked. Is that still so? It would explain why you'd have mixed feelings about experiencing it again.