Revert wrote:
My two cents but Houtx was mentioned as one person who was not successful on naltrexone and this was said in passing that it must have been the Nordic - but this lovely lady who appears on other forums as well has NOT been successful using several other methods including baclofen. So please I think this is getting into silliness.
I only brought up Houtx because she came to mind when I was writing my response. Come to find out, she wasn't taking Nodict, but that's not the point. The point is, a large percentage of the people who start TSM on here quit. If I had to guess at the percentage, I would guess it to be opposite the success of TSM reported by Sinclair. Why is that? Sinclair claims thousands of people in Finland have been cured at a 78% success rate. Why is our community nearly opposite this number?
This isn't a new issue that was brought up in the last week or so. Questions about the effectiveness of Nodict have been floating around this forum for 6mon to a year (perhaps longer). The problem is, these posts are hit and miss and end up getting burred and fall out of sight. This topic is only just now being highlighted, as I asked N101CS for forum access to sticky the topic so it doesn't get buried again. In the last week or so, I've had half a dozen people contact me claiming to have backslide on Nodict and/or failed at TSM while on Nodict. Moreover, 3-4 people have posted to these threads in the last week or two with similar experiences.
This is not silliness, it is a red flag.
Revert wrote:
These things take on a life of their own just because of unsubstantiated statements! There has never been any proof that lack of success on TSM was down to Nordic. There are so many factors at work. Simply trying another pill and having success in the short term could be the placebo effect too!! I've seen this kind of panic sweep through this community in the past - someone makes a statement and within days it's blown out of all proportion. And when River tries to protect their business this is seen as nefarious in some way. Please people think about the power of these posts to do real harm.
We may not have hard evidence or information from a credentialed professional, but what we do have is mounting circumstantial evidence that Nodict may not be an effective form of NAL for TSM. With a dozen or more people coming forward with issues, I think we need to take a good hard look at this and make sure everyone is informed on what is being reported.
The real harm in this situation is if Nodict is in fact ineffective and we recommend people take this medication -- we would be setting people up to fail. There is no harm if we are wrong in our suspicions and members order a different form of NAL from River or All Day Chemist. At most, the pharmaceutical company loses a few sales. I hardly see this as very harmful.
Revert wrote:
So let's not spread it around here that Nordic is not a good product, or that you have to chew it. I think we have to assume it's fine unless we KNOW differently.
I believe we need to take just the opposite stance on this topic. I believe we need to warn users that Nodict may not be effective with TSM, as reported by other users on this forum, so that they can make an informed decision on which medication to use for their treatment. It would be highly irresponsible of us to sit on this information because we are worried about a vendor getting his/her noise bent out of shape about lost sales.