Hi HF,
I have been catching up with you with interest, especially your last post because I am also thinking about experimenting drinking without Nal. I came across a man called Stanton Peele who believes that most people display addictive behaviour at some point in their lives, he says that most of those people take control of their addiction 
unaided, that only the minority seek treatment. 
Peele says that addiction is 
not a disease, that it's not a medical problem but a "life problem", and gives an example of Vietnam vets who stopped using heroine (I think) when they came home from service. 
Basically Peele says that the people who seek treatment suffer most because they end up in a 12 step ideology, which he says is dangerous, because it forces a person to self identify as a hopeless addict who cannot control his habit. Causing them to loose faith in their own ability to control their lives.
Whether we agree or not intellectually, I think we subconsciously absorb this message because, well, there is no other. Even we here at this site who are following TSM, even those who have gained control, probably believe that without Naltrexone, we would return to uncontrolled drinking. To the best of my knowledge, any member of this forum who has tried drinking without Naltrexone has reported a (albeit slow) return to abusive drinking. 
Why? 
Is it because our endorphins aren't blocked any more? Or is it because we don't 
believe we can control our drinking without Naltrexone? because "once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic' is so ingrained in us that it has become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Could it be that we have been able to step outside our belief enough to try an 
aided treatment to regain control (TSM) but not far enough to try 
unaided? These are some the questions I am asking myself at the moment, sparked by Stanton Peele. 
A while ago you said:
Quote:
I have limited my consumption by initially deciding to exercise control. I could have rocked on drinking low thirties. But, I decided at some point, I have to take responsibility and move forward
. 
To do something like this, one has to believe one is capable of doing it, one has to have 
confidence in that ability, and I think that confidence in our ability to change our behaviour is THE most decisive part of succeeding or failing. We are what we believe, even if, or more likely, 
especially if we aren't consciously aware of that belief. 
Well, that's the theory I am considering testing. Do I have enough confidence to go it alone and drink responsibly without Naltrexone? 
I'd be most interested in your thoughts on this. If you're interested, I started a thread about SP here: 
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=2930Best,
Curi.