joe12pack wrote:
His answers don't appear to be contradictory to me. he told netty , "If you are responding well to 25 mg naltrexone 30 minutes to an hour before drinking then by all means proceed." because netty's numbers had drastically dropped on 25mg.
In a case in which the numbers hadn't drastically dropped, seems to me to make sense to stick with the suggested TSM dosage. maybe I missed something here.
I think the bottom line so far is that it's a matter of totally blocking the receptors more than anything. if 25mg does the job, it does the job. probably safest to stick with 50 though. in my case I may go back up to 75.
I guess I am taking Dr. Eskapa too literally when he wrote from his reading of the research he would not recommend going down to 25 mg if you can tolerate the medication.
If one responds slowly to TSM how does one really know if 25 mg is having the same effect as 50 mg. That is really the question. In Nettys situation, the response to Nal was extremely fast and noticeable as was the difference between 25 and 50 mg. Maybe for those of us that are taking months (and months and months:-) to notice anything would do ok on 25 mg but how would we know. I tried 75 mg for a few weeks and did not notice any difference from 50mg so I would not notice any difference on 25mg , logically. Just sayin. Ok, ramble over.
I drink daily for 4-5 hours so I thought that 25 mg would be enough but then you guys got into the half life and metabolite and complicated my simple way of looking at it
I am curious though about the Gaba receptors vs. opiate. I thought that addiction to alcohol was the same for everyone. How is it that my addiction could be Gaba and other Al addicted folks are opiate. If this is indeed Gaba then the route I would have to take would be Bac. Which, I do not want to take.