JC -- I think I may have read your first post wrong.

Yes, I agree that it is a myth that "you're screwed" if you drink off naltrexone a few times and I'm glad you're trying to dispel that.
It truly is a drag that so few know of TSM, but the word seems to be spreading. New folks are coming on at a faster rate. We not only have the rehab people shooing us off other boards; we also must contend with the misinformation about proper use of naltrexone that starts with the prescribing information for doctors.
When it still had the naltrexone patent, DuPont apparently decided it could sell more naltrexone by touting it as an anti-craving drug, even though the science at the time showed it is not effective when used that way. Dr. Sinclair actually patented TSM in order to have some input into the package insert/prescribing info. DuPont chose to end-run him by keeping silent about naltrexone+drinking. Sinclair has expressed regret that his patent strategy backfired. Eskapa details this in the book. There simply is no pharmacological basis for any claim that naltrexone works with abstinence, beyond a short honeymoon or a placebo effect. Naltrexone is perhaps the most misunderstood drug in the history of pharmacology.
We see people over at MyWayOut swearing by naltrexone, especially in the 30-day injection called Vivitrol (which IS patented), as an abstinence-promoting drug. In some cases, they have paid thousands for the injection and thousands more for therapy to treat their addiction. Then, they complain when naltrexone "quits working." Dr. Amiesen himself is practically contemptuous of naltrexone, which didn't "work" for him (i.e. keep him abstinent).
So our mission is doubly tough in that we must not only educate; we also must RE-educate. It's a frustrating process. But we gradually are getting there. Eskapa's book, Ben's Youtube project, ToxicGirl's blog and of course this board: We seem to be growing exponentially. TSM is too rich of a secret to be kept for long.