elfern wrote:
If this is the case I'm all the more eager that tsm should work affording me a brief respite between one hell and the next .
OMG, this would be funny if it weren't so sad. The concept of 'hell' is so misunderstood. I was a Christian writer for years, but became. . .unwelcome. . .among my editorial/publishing friends when I introduced topics or perspectives that weren't compatible with their particular dogmas.
Fortunately, there are many good Christians who understand that the interpretation of Scripture relating to the subject has been greatly skewed, and that an all-loving God doesn't throw his beloved creation into an eternal place of torment, without hope of redemption.
Perhaps this isn't the place for it, but imagine how many fundamentalists view God's 'mercy.'
1. We are His creation.
2. He has unconditional love for each one of us
3. He sent His Son to die a bloody tortuous death so that those who 'believe' on Him will live eternally
4. This salvation is unconditional
5. Only those who are 'called' to faith will come to believe, and be saved
6. Those who are not called to have faith, will burn eternally in hell. . .they really have no personal say or choice in the matter
7. Well. . .maybe the salvation of those who are called isn't really 'eternal,' as some may 'lose' their faith and be damned again. (The other side of the coin: though a person professed true faith, and lived like a 'real' Christian, they weren't really saved in the first place.)
How can any rational person get their mind set comfortably around this set of doctrines? I think this teaching regarding hell literally frightens people so much that they don't DARE question it, for fear of hell. Sad.