I've been telling my GP (General Practitioner - regular doctor here in the UK) I've been abstinent for the last three months, when I haven't. I've been drinking and following TSM. He doesn't know I'm taking Naltrexone, and thinks I've had only one or two lapses (of a few days) back into drinking.
At one of the lapses he knows about, I was back to drinking whisky 24/7 because my anxiety was totally out of control. As a result, he prescribed me as much diazepam as I needed to quell anxiety and avoid returning to the destructive drinking I went through at the turn of the year.
I take diazepam in the daytime for anxiety (though I am mostly strict about how much I take - after months on the stuff I am dependent, I know, and wish to reduce, but am waiting for the effects of an anti-anxiety beta-blocker to kick in before doing so) and I drink in the evenings.
My last liver function test came back within the 'normal' range. I was absolutely (thankful, and) amazed as my drinking's been pretty heavy in some recent weeks.
My GP has been very supportive of everything I've been through this last year or two. He's perfunctory - to the point. On the other hand, I think his wider knowledge is limited, he doesn't seem to plan ahead, and doesn't always think things through (giving unlimited diazepam to a known substance abuser - what??!!)
My progress on TSM is reasonable, I think, so far. No 'cure' at this stage (week thirteen) but there are tremendous glimmers of change that I see weekly, and I'm convinced I'm on the right path here (with Baclofen something I may consider adding in the future for anxiety, even if 'cured' by TSM).
My great dilemma is that I'm lying to my GP weekly about drinking every time he asks me if I have been and I say 'no'. I've been drinking daily for three months now following a period of abstinence, and feel in my body that I'm completely drink-dependent. If anything were to happen to me and I was hospitalised not only would my Nal use have to come out into the open, but also that I'll need a chemical detox most probably alongside any other treatment, to prevent seizures. After that point (however unlikely it is) my doctor (or any other) would never believe another word I say - it'll be on my health records forever that I lied about substance misuse...
Why do I lie? I mentioned Baclofen to him and he dismissed it completely from his reading of that big book of medicines all doctors have. He doesn't think outside the box to any extent, and isn't prepared to not follow 'the norm'. I haven't even bothered to mention TSM to him as I know it'll be a dead end. It was my suggestion that I move on to a beta-blocker - instead of the SSRI he kept pushing for - for the effects on my heart that anxiety produces, to which he said 'good idea!' I feel like I'm my own best doctor and really sailing with my own map and compass, but feel terrible about being dishonest.
I've tried most of the other GPs at the same practice at some point, and they seem equally to do things 'by the book'. In fact one of them wouldn't prescribe me more than 10 x 2 mgs diazepam within a month for the awful anxiety I suffered during extremely traumatic circumstances late last year - with nothing to calm me apart from alcohol the result was my first ever descent into 24/7 drinking, out of utter desperation, for five months; an eventual detox/rehab; a year off work (so far); and in any case I now take that amount every two days...anyone know what the opposite of preventative medicine's called?
I am under a private doctor for TSM, who is not in touch with my GP.
My dilemma is the lies I am telling my GP, who is doing his very best to help me in every other way, and what would happen if this all came out. I'm sorry for the lengthy post, but this is tearing at my mind daily right now. I'd love some advice, and thought it best to include as much detail as possible.
Thanks so much for reading

eight