There are all kinds of reasons why people drink so I can only speak for myself. But Peeles argument simply doesn't work for me. I never drank to fulfill some sort of loss in my life or "allows them to cope with a life that feels meaningless or out of control." In fact my life has been really rather normal and almost text book Americana middle class upbringing and adult life. I've always held a job, a house, two cats in the yard and that sort of thing.
I drank because I drank. What that means is that the only reason why I drank is because I drank the day before and as such it created a physical withdrawal that caused both physical and mental suffering unless I drank again. That's pretty much it in a nut shell and it was all driven by the model that Sinclair created and from the very first dose of Naltrexon that drive has been completely squashed.
So in my mind he is 100% wrong to assume that there is no medical treatment for alcoholism and that it is merely a set of psychological disorders, causes, reasons or what ever.
Where I will agree with him is that the addiction is two fold, especially after 25 years of continuously doing it. First it is a physiological phenomenon. Addicts become physiologically addicted to their substance of choice to where if they do not take it they will suffer physical pain and since the mind and body are connected the addict suffers emotional pain as well. And second as a result of many years 'experience' or in accordance to TSM 'learning' the addict develops all kinds of bad habits. For me personally as an alcoholic the bad habit would be feeling like I deserve a drink for getting pay raise, after a nice long bike ride, mowing the lawn, hanging out with friends and so on. That's where the ideas of Peele might be worth while in that one needs to change their behavior to rid themselves of bad habits and excuses to drink. But TSM provides the platform and foundation for which someone can then go on to develop those skills. Without TSM I would continue to drink, because I drank.
JoeSixPack wrote:
Linda Burlison (A Prescription for Alcoholics) worked in the industry and says that AUD sufferers are actually targeted by marketing.
That's terrible but not surprising. I think they hit up young people too in order to get the hook in them. Just look at some of those high alcohol disgusting drinks they sell in 24oz cans that look like soda and are really sweet but pack a punch. It's really just bum wine marketed toward college students to go out and have a 'good time.'