Nutella wrote:
Quote:
Come on Nutella-couldn't they say (& haven't they said) the same about TSM? Lack of data does not a research method make.
I suppose they could. And yes, the lack of data certainly should make one cautious about the claims. In my mind, TSM has quite a bit more going for it than most "evolutionary biochemistry" theories put forward by the latest wave of nutritionists. What amuses me most is that there are as many diet opinions as there are dietitians and that they contradict each other most of the time, yet everyone proclaims his theories to be grounded in solid science.
I don't post a lot. I think I posted somewhat steadily over last few month. A comment or two every week or two, maybe. Last I reported was 51 weeks and since then my weekly numbers are 15.0(0), 11.0(2), 10.5(2), 12.5(3) and 16(0). (AF in parenthesis). So more of the same.
Thanks my favorite chocolately hazelnut spread.
there are as many diet opinions as there are dietitians and that they contradict each other most of the time, yet everyone proclaims his theories to be grounded in solid science. Sounds like there are at least as many diets as there are purported cures for alcoholism-and they all contradict each other in some way or another, and they're all right (at least we can agree on one thing).
Your numbers look excellent and congratulations--thanks for providing me early encouragement in the forum.