epenthesis wrote:
I don't particularly mind being told I'm still an alcoholic or addicted to pills--whatever I'm called, it's just a label that doesn't reflect any kind of difficult problem I have to face. It's kind of funny; I used to say I was a "problem drinker" to acknowledge that the situation was serious without using the A-word, but now I'm an "alcoholic" who doesn't have a drinking problem.
I'm with you on that, epenthesis. Once I get free of this, the labels won't really amount to much - I'll (hopefully!) be a person for whom alcohol is not a problem, period. I just find it breathtakingly arrogant that people with no professional credentials whatsoever have appointed themselves the arbiters of what to label others.
I have a friend who hasn't had a drink in years who still constantly refers to himself as an alcoholic in casual conversation. It's very sad. He has assured me that I, too, am an alcoholic, but that our mutual friend who drank vodka straight out of the bottle all day for years and very nearly destroyed his liver was not an alcoholic because he can handle a beer now and then. So, according to that post hoc reasoning, we can't know who is and isn't a true alcoholic because some of them might start drinking responsibly someday and invalidate the "diagnoses".